logo

Science of Life Journal

Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and scientific validity. Our review process is designed to be fair, transparent, and constructive.

Types of Peer Review

We employ double-blind peer review, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This ensures unbiased evaluation based solely on scientific merit.

πŸ‘€ Authors Blinded

Reviewers do not know author identities

πŸ” Reviewers Blinded

Authors do not know reviewer identities

⏰ Review Timeline

5-7
days

Initial Editorial Screening

Quick assessment of scope and quality

3-4
weeks

Peer Review

Expert evaluation by 2-3 reviewers

1-2
weeks

Editorial Decision

Final decision after reviews received

4-6
weeks

Revision Period

Time for authors to address reviewer comments

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ”¬ Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are carefully selected based on:

πŸŽ“ Expertise

Subject matter expertise and research area

πŸ“š Publication Record

Strong publication history in relevant areas

βš–οΈ No Conflicts

No conflicts of interest with authors

🌍 Diversity

Geographic and institutional diversity

πŸ“‹ Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on the following criteria:

✨ Originality and Significance

Novel contribution to the field and potential impact

πŸ”¬ Methodology and Rigor

Sound research design and appropriate methods

πŸ“ Clarity of Presentation

Clear writing and logical organization

βœ… Validity of Conclusions

Conclusions supported by data and analysis

πŸ“– Appropriate Citations

Proper literature review and references

πŸ“Š Editorial Decisions

βœ…

Accept

Manuscript accepted as is or with minor editorial changes

πŸ”§

Minor Revisions

Small changes required before acceptance

πŸ”¨

Major Revisions

Substantial modifications needed, re-review required

❌

Reject

Manuscript not suitable for publication

βš–οΈ Appeals

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by providing a detailed justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals should include:

  • Point-by-point response to reviewer concerns
  • Evidence supporting the appeal
  • Specific reasons why the decision should be reconsidered

Review Transparency: We are committed to fair and transparent peer review processes that maintain the highest standards of scholarly publishing.

Related Topics

#peer review#quality#evaluation#reviewers

Related Policies

Terms & ConditionsFeatured

Terms and Conditions

Terms and conditions governing the use of our journal management system platform.

2
2 min
Updated: Jan 27, 2026 11:59 AM
PrivacyFeatured

Privacy Policy

Our commitment to protecting your personal information and data privacy in our journal management system.

2
2 min
Updated: Jan 27, 2026 10:29 AM
Open AccessFeatured

Open Access Policy

Our commitment to making research freely accessible to the global community.

2
2 min
Updated: Jan 27, 2026 11:56 AM